Matter & Energy · Depth 2 · Introductory · 6 min read

Modern Physics

Relativity and quantum physics: the ideas from about 1900 to 1930 that changed how we understand space, time, light and atoms.

On this page
  1. What this part of the map covers
  2. Relativity: light, space and time
  3. Time that stretches
  4. E = mc
  5. The quantum idea
  6. Waves and particles
  7. A new mechanics
  8. The math (optional)
  9. Common misconceptions
  10. Going further
  11. Real-life examples
  12. Evidence & sources

What this part of the map covers

Early in the 20th century, physicists made great progress in understanding the microscopic world and how it differs from the large-scale world we see.[1] Two theories emerged in the early 20th century: relativity, which Albert Einstein proposed starting in 1905, and quantum mechanics, which grew out of early-20th-century progress in understanding the microscopic world.[2, 1] The older physics still works for most everyday objects, but quantum mechanics goes on working in the world of atoms, where the older theory fails.[14, 1]

Relativity: light, space and time

Relativity is really two related theories. Special relativity links space, time, mass and energy; general relativity brings gravity in.[2] By the 1920s, physicists widely accepted them.[2]

Special relativity starts from the idea that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for every observer, however the observer or the light source is moving.[2, 12] The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) gives that speed as 299,792,458 metres per second, and nothing, whether matter, information or energy, can travel faster.[4] The theory also showed that space and time are joined in one fabric, space-time.[5]

Time that stretches

Special relativity made a startling claim: the faster you move relative to someone standing still, the more slowly time passes for you.[5] This is time dilation.[5] General relativity added that the more strongly you feel gravity, the more slowly time passes, an effect called gravitational time dilation.[5, 6]

Testing this had to wait for the first usable atomic clocks, built in the 1950s.[6, 5] In 1971, Joseph Hafele and Richard Keating took atomic clocks up into the sky, and their results agreed with both special and general relativity within the margin of error.[6] In 2010, David Wineland and colleagues at NIST ran two optical clocks at heights that differed by only about a foot.[5] Atomic-clock tests on airplanes, satellites and skyscrapers have confirmed Einstein’s predictions about time, and relativity is now one of the most rigorously tested theories in physics.[5]

E = mc2

Later in 1905, Einstein showed that mass and energy are equivalent.[12] In careful terms, his equation says that whenever an object’s rest energy changes, its mass changes with it, and that anything with mass has a rest energy.[17]

In 1932, Cockcroft and Walton were the first to see a proton striking a lithium-7 nucleus and releasing two alpha particles, and the particles going in had more rest mass than those coming out.[17] In fusion, too, the new nucleus has less mass than the two it came from, which is why energy is released.[3]

The quantum idea

In 1900, Max Planck explained the “ultraviolet catastrophe”: a theory by Rayleigh and Jeans predicted that light from hot objects should become infinitely intense at short wavelengths, when in fact it drops to zero.[10] Planck proposed that energy is gained or lost only in whole-number multiples of a smallest unit, a quantum.[10, 19] He could not explain why, and saw it as a technical fix that he hoped would one day prove unnecessary.[10]

In 1905, Einstein used Planck’s idea to explain the photoelectric effect, in which materials give off electrons when light of certain wavelengths strikes them.[16, 1] He treated light as made of separate energy packets, now called photons.[16, 7] His 1921 Nobel Prize was for this work, not for relativity.[12]

In 1913, Niels Bohr used these quantum ideas to propose that an atom can exist only in certain stable energy states.[13, 19] His model explained the light given off by hydrogen, but ran into trouble with other atoms.[19]

Waves and particles

Quantum mechanics explains how very small objects have the features of both particles and waves.[1] Light sent through two narrow slits makes bright and dark bands that only a wave could produce, yet the pattern still builds up when single photons pass through one at a time.[9] This is wave-particle duality, and electrons show it too.[9, 1]

A new mechanics

By 1924, a clean break with classical physics was widely seen as necessary.[14] In 1925, Werner Heisenberg laid down a new mechanics, and in 1926 Erwin Schrödinger gave another version built on a wave equation; the two turned out to be equivalent.[19, 15, 18] That same year, Max Born proposed reading the wave function as giving probabilities for what a measurement will find.[19, 1]

In 1927, Heisenberg introduced his uncertainty relations: roughly, the more precisely a particle’s position is known, the less precisely its momentum can be, and the other way round.[18, 11] That year Bohr also presented complementarity, his reading of those relations, and he and Einstein began a long debate about quantum theory.[13, 12]

The math (optional)

The energy of one quantum of light equals Planck’s constant (h) times the light’s frequency (ν):[19, 10]

E = hν

For mass and energy, Einstein’s equation is written E0 = mc2, where E0 is rest energy, m is mass (rest mass) and c is the speed of light.[17, 4]

Common misconceptions

“E = mc2 means matter is turned into energy.” The Department of Energy puts it loosely, saying that mass and energy can be converted into each other.[3] Philosophers of physics writing in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy call “matter converted into energy” a category mistake: in relativity, as in classical physics, mass and energy are both properties of physical systems.[17] Even those who treat mass and energy as different properties disagree on whether any physical process converts one into the other.[17]

“Uncertainty just means measuring disturbs the particle.” Simple accounts put it that way.[14, 11] But the exact meaning of the principle is debated, and in his original work Heisenberg spoke only of uncertainty relations.[18]

“There is one Copenhagen interpretation.” It is not a single, unified view, Bohr never precisely defined complementarity, and rival interpretations such as many worlds have gained ground.[19]

Going further

Start with Light & Waves and Energy & Work, then see Atoms & Chemistry, Gravity, Satellites and Transistors.

Real-life examples

  • Your phone's map

    GPS satellites move so fast that special relativity makes their clocks fall behind clocks on Earth by 7 microseconds a day, while the weaker gravity of their orbit makes them gain 45 microseconds a day.[5, 6] Overall they run 38 microseconds a day fast, which would soon make their signals useless if it were not constantly corrected.[6]

  • A clock up a tower

    In one experiment, a raised clock ran faster, as relativity predicts: four nanoseconds (billionths of a second) faster per day.[6]

  • The transistors in a smartphone

    A smartphone holds billions of transistors, which work thanks to the wave nature of electrons, something scientists understand through quantum mechanics.[1]

  • An MRI scan

    Many subatomic particles, the proton among them, have a kind of angular momentum called spin, and medical MRI scanners make use of it.[1]

  • Sunshine

    The Sun and other stars shine because of fusion, in which two light nuclei join to form a heavier one and release energy.[3]

Connected across the map

Learn more

Short descriptions are our own summaries. The resources belong to, and are run by, their publishers.

Evidence & sources

Level 1 · Established

Supported by extensive evidence and broad scientific consensus.

Why this level? Relativity and quantum mechanics are long-established physics, tested for about a century. The page is written from US government science agencies (the Department of Energy, NIST and NASA) and CERN's teaching material, with history from MacTutor (University of St Andrews), the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and university chemistry textbooks on LibreTexts.

Keep in mind: The physics is settled, but some of its wording and meaning is not: how to describe E = mc², what the uncertainty principle means and how to interpret quantum theory are still debated, and the page says so where it applies.

This is a Knowledge Atlas editorial classification of the sources we could find, not a certificate of truth. How we evaluate knowledge

Sources

Based on 19 sources from 7 institutions: DOE, NIST, NASA, CERN, LibreTexts and 2 more.

Show all 19 sourcesHide the list
  1. AuthoritativeU.S. Department of Energy· Government agencyDOE Explains...Quantum Mechanics (U.S. Department of Energy)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  2. AuthoritativeU.S. Department of Energy· Government agencyDOE Explains...Relativity (U.S. Department of Energy)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  3. AuthoritativeU.S. Department of Energy· Government agencyDOE Explains...Fusion Reactions (U.S. Department of Energy)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  4. AuthoritativeNational Institute of Standards and Technology· Government agencyMeet the Constants (NIST SI redefinition)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  5. AuthoritativeNational Institute of Standards and Technology· Government agencyPutting Einstein to the Test (NIST)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  6. AuthoritativeNational Institute of Standards and Technology· Government agencyPutting Einstein to the Test With the World's Most Accurate Clocks (NIST Taking Measure)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  7. AuthoritativeNational Aeronautics and Space Administration· Government agencyAnatomy of an Electromagnetic Wave (NASA Science)Opened and checked against this page on 29 Sept 2026
  8. AuthoritativeNational Aeronautics and Space Administration· Government agencyThe Electromagnetic Spectrum (Imagine the Universe)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  9. AuthoritativeCERN· IntergovernmentalScience Centre to Go: the double slit experimentOpened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  10. ReliableLibreTexts· Academic publisherPlanck's Quantum Theory (LibreTexts Chemistry)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  11. ReliableLibreTexts· Academic publisherHeisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (LibreTexts Chemistry)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  12. ScholarlyMacTutor History of Mathematics (University of St Andrews)· UniversityAlbert Einstein: biography (MacTutor)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  13. ScholarlyMacTutor History of Mathematics (University of St Andrews)· UniversityNiels Bohr: biography (MacTutor)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  14. ScholarlyMacTutor History of Mathematics (University of St Andrews)· UniversityWerner Heisenberg: obituary (MacTutor, Times obituaries)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  15. ScholarlyMacTutor History of Mathematics (University of St Andrews)· UniversityErwin Schrodinger: obituary (MacTutor, Times obituaries)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  16. ScholarlyMacTutor History of Mathematics (University of St Andrews)· UniversityLight through the ages: Relativity and quantum eraOpened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  17. ScholarlyStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy· Academic publisherThe Equivalence of Mass and Energy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  18. ScholarlyStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy· Academic publisherThe Uncertainty Principle (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026
  19. ScholarlyStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy· Academic publisherCopenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)Opened and checked against this page on 30 Sept 2026